Skip to main content
PreventionWeb
Menu
Author(s) Enrico Quagliarini Gabriele Bernardini Luca Domenella et al.

Supporting “Build Back Better” in historical towns: a novel methodology to include users’ exposure and vulnerability in strategic function relocation assessment

Source
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (Elsevier)

This work aims to develop a methodological framework to evaluate the multi-scale impact of function relocation in Historical Urban Built Environments (HUBEs) assessing users' vulnerability and exposure at the: (1) macroscale, to evaluate if relocation can benefit the whole HUBE safety; (2) mesoscale (open space-related), to identify critical “hot-spots” in the HUBE. The framework is showcased on a significant earthquake-prone Italian HUBE. Applying ‘Build Back Better’ (BBB) principles to Historical Urban Built Environments (HUBEs) means balancing sustainable structural and non-structural strategies with revitalization and preservation tasks, by addressing multiple risk factors. Among them, user exposure (“how many people?”) and vulnerability (“of which typology?”) can describe how the HUBE and its composing parts can be attractive depending on their functions, also impacting potential damage and losses. Relocating strategic functions can directly impact these factors, being strictly linked with urban policies.

Existing approaches try to quantify user factors over space and time, but operational implications for decision-makers seem to be still limited. In particular, validated methodologies exploiting geospatial tools are used to generate typical use scenarios (i.e. daytime, night-time, holidays), aggregating micro-scale inputs on indoor and outdoor functions at meso/macroscales. User factors metrics are derived to compare current and relocation scenarios on selected buildings. Results demonstrate the framework capabilities in quantifying relocation impacts at the considered scales, thus providing valuable support to urban planning practices. Its implementation in decision-support systems would enable dynamic monitoring of urban development policies, prioritizing risk-reduction over space, and focusing interventions on physical vulnerability where user factors impact increases.

Download

Access Supporting “Build Back Better” in historical towns: a novel methodology to include users’ exposure and vulnerability in strategic function relocation assessment
Download a backup copy hosted by this site PDF, 15.2 MB English

We keep a copy of many documents to improve long-term access. Use this if the publisher’s site is slow or unavailable. Problems? Contact us.

Last checked: 25 September 2025

Editors' recommendations

  • Build Back Better: Guidance on building flood resistant homes
  • Priority actions to enhance readiness for resilient recovery
  • Good practices in financing recovery and building back better
  • Explore more resources on Recovery

Explore further

Themes Cultural heritage Recovery
Country and region Italy
1-s2.0-s2212420925005242-main.pdf thumbnail
ISBN/ISSN/DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105700 (DOI)
Number of pages
24 p.
Publication year
2025

Also featured on

PreventionWeb

Is this page useful?

Yes No
Report an issue on this page

Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window).

The International Recovery Platform (IRP) is a global partnership working to strengthen knowledge, and share experiences and lessons on building back better in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction.

Latest IRP videos and photos: YouTube Flickr Contact IRP

Loading